Wednesday 29 September 2010

The Studentification of our Cities

Studentification: The  growth of large numbers of Students living in concentrated areas, close to Universities

With huge numbers of Students either starting or returning to Universities, in towns and cities up and down the country, one of the big questions is where should they all be housed. Is it the Universities responsibility to re-invest in accommodation or should it be left to private enterprise or even the state. The effects of large numbers of students on a community can be devastating . The following is a conclusion from a topic paper I produced on Student Housing  analysing possible solutions in aiming to prevent the further Studentification of large areas of our major cities and open up these areas back to local communities. 

In one sense it could be argued there lay an ironic paradox between on one hand New Labours vision of sustainable communities and on the other there desire for mass participation in higher education and the geographical effects this is having on neighbourhoods and housing supply. While the Housing in Multiple Occupation Lobby also state that they fully recognise Higher educational institutes and their students can be an asset to their town. There is great concern where the in migration of students has resulted in a demographic imbalance, which is far too common. 

It is vital that local authorities, community groups, Universities and the Student Unions work together to develop effective management schemes, perhaps localism is very much key here with different areas of the country experiencing slightly different problems, which a single piece of national legislation may not be able to tackle effectively.

It is important that communities recognise the benefits that students can bring, most notably the public transport improvements and the fact the majority will spend locally. And that too stringent regulation can shift the balance too far as to force students out completely again going against the governments wish for balanced and sustainable communities.

There is also a need to plan for the effects that the displacement of students may have on other areas and ensure there remains a constant supply of housing for low income earners.
Opal Court (Fallowfield Manchester) Opal are one of the largest providers of managed student accommodation, 
Photo is my own 

The role of purpose built managed accommodation looks set to increase especially as it becomes more difficult for private landlords to develop Houses in Multiple Occupation in established student areas. Although with schemes of new purpose built accommodation there lays a need for good design and improved interaction with the community in which they are situated as well as local infrastructure improvements if they are needed.  The recent Recession may also have a short term impact in reducing the number of new landlords and investment in HMOs, as credit becomes harder to find.

A high number of students can distort local markets to the extent where the indigenous population is forced to lie elsewhere. There therefore is now more need than ever before to tackle this issue as if not we run the risk of turning our University towns and cities into the UKs equivalent of the Spanish tourist resort; characterised by a seasonal and constantly changing population. 

Monday 27 September 2010

Leeds: Eastgate Quarter Development Proposal

The long awaited revised proposals for the Eastgate Quarter in Leeds were revealed to the public last week, and I for one was hugely disappointed with what is currently proposed for this prominent North Eastern corner site of the City Centre.

I have a number of concerns with the scheme, which will transform a huge area of the city and because of its scale, could come to define perceptions of Leeds, perhaps as the Victoria Quarter did, but not as in that case  in a positive way.

 My main concern is the loss of the Bookends at the End of Eastgate, these buildings offer a distinct and grand gateway to the shopping core, which would be a shame to lose. The replacement of one bookend with a John Lewis (JL) store driven by Commercial greed. I also worry about the rear  of the JL store backing onto George Street, which will I fear will make this street more depressing and will not offer a great first impression for visitors coming into the city by bus or coach.

The retention of the ugliest  building on Eastgate is Inexcusable if the Southern Bookend has to go, while the drawings of the Templar arcade do not fill me with confidence.

The Templar arcade building will be massive and involve the destruction of a number of Historical structures, which if renovated could provide a handsome district, instead there are two token refurbishments, both patronizingly incorporated into the mammoth structure. 

The scheme is also amazingly one dimensional, and despite the advice of planning policy incorporates little more than retail units, which will only ensure the area dies after 6pm.

Where is the City Centre park that is so desperately needed? perhaps Liverpool is the example here with the excellent Liverpool One scheme, which through good design has managed to incorporate a Park, with car parking provided below, this scheme also includes a hotel, Open streets, a mixture of architects leading to a mix of styles and a new transport interchange. The location of the Eastgate Quarter to the Bus and Coach station and even the markets makes me wonder why it could not have included improvements to these areas, as the Bullring scheme in Birmingham does so with the markets so magnificently. 

The reasons for much of this is of course commercially driven and the need to accommodate so much retail floor-space in order for the developer to get a maximum return and the need to accommodate the JL empire, while the lack of architects on the scheme is worrying cost cutting as we come out of the recession.

Although short term investment would surely be welcomed, I feel a long term approach needs to be taken here, and if that means telling the developer where to go, than so be it. Cities are primarily for living in, they should be unique amongst each other, all this scheme offers is a ubiquitous shopping centre at the expense of a real City district. Is this really progress? 


Further Information:
The Masterplan can be viewed at:

The website for the development, including details on how to give your views:
http://www.eastgateleeds.co.uk/